Infrastructure is the foundation upon which we build entire societies and economies. It underpins sustained well-being. IFSD has developed a best-practice framework for driving better infrastructure performance in an uncertain world, navigating trade-offs due to scarce fiscal resources and linking assets and investments to the outcomes that citizens want.
Front-end due diligence The IFSD team was retained by a provincial government seeking to determine whether the costing of a proposed telecom infrastructure project was reasonable. The team built a cost estimating relationship model to build a normative (i.e. should cost) lifecycle estimate for the project. The unique data acquired by the team enabled a very high quality statistically based estimate (phase 1) which was subsequently validated by a bottom-up engineering estimate (phase 2). The resulting reduced fiscal allocation is expected to save the government $700 million+ over the project lifecycle. |
Front-end due diligence The IFSD team was retained by a provincial government seeking to determine whether the costing of a proposed telecom infrastructure project was reasonable. The team built a cost estimating relationship model to build a normative (i.e. should cost) lifecycle estimate for the project. The unique data acquired by the team enabled a very high quality statistically based estimate (phase 1) which was subsequently validated by a bottom-up engineering estimate (phase 2). The resulting reduced fiscal allocation is expected to save the government $700 million+ over the project lifecycle. |
Best value procurement A provincial government asked the IFSD team to critically assess the appropriate procurement approach to ensure best value for taxpayers for a large-scale infrastructure project (i.e. sole source vs. competitive). Important considerations were identified for price, value, technology as well as the assessment and transfer of risk. The government accepted the recommendation and changed its procurement strategy to pursue a competitive tender based on the project’s research findings. |
Best value procurement A provincial government asked the IFSD team to critically assess the appropriate procurement approach to ensure best value for taxpayers for a large-scale infrastructure project (i.e. sole source vs. competitive). Important considerations were identified for price, value, technology as well as the assessment and transfer of risk. The government accepted the recommendation and changed its procurement strategy to pursue a competitive tender based on the project’s research findings. |
Best value procurement A provincial government asked the IFSD team to critically assess the appropriate procurement approach to ensure best value for taxpayers for a large-scale infrastructure project (i.e. sole source vs. competitive). Important considerations were identified for price, value, technology as well as the assessment and transfer of risk. The government accepted the recommendation and changed its procurement strategy to pursue a competitive tender based on the project’s research findings. |